Exploring the Impact of Transportation Infrastructure Construction on China's Economic Growth
1.Introduction
With the rapid growth of China's economy, domestic infrastructure construction has been newly developed. In 2008, the international financial crisis broke out under the influence of factors such as the poor operation of capital market funds, and China launched an economic stimulus plan to meet the challenges brought by that crisis; the government invested a considerable portion of funds in infrastructure construction projects, which strongly promoted the development of China's infrastructure construction. The construction of transportation infrastructure has driven the flow of goods and promoted the employment of workers. For a long time, the relationship between transportation infrastructure construction and economic development has been widely discussed, and scholars at home and abroad have also given arguments and explanations on different aspects.
1)Boartnet (1997) examined the relationship between transportation investment and economic development in all California counties from 1968 to 1988 and found that there were differences in the impact of transportation on regional economies. Some areas have benefited and some have been damaged.
2)Ming Liu and Yulin Liu found that when the level of transportation infrastructure reaches a certain extreme, continued investment will significantly reduce the pulling effect of transportation on the economy. Conversely, underinvestment in transportation infrastructure will also constrain local economic development.
3)Tan Jiangrong found that there is a lag in the impact of transportation infrastructure construction on economic development, and the role of transportation infrastructure in promoting economic development will gradually increase with the extension of time.
As China's economy enters a new stage, whether the Chinese government should continue to invest in transportation infrastructure has become a question. Due to the further economic development of each region, is there a difference in the economic boosting effect of transportation infrastructure? Is there a difference in the impact of railroad and road construction on the economy? Based on these questions, we choose the GDP and transportation infrastructure construction data from 2011 to 2020 to conduct the study.
2.Data and descriptive statistics
My data has 320 entries, recording data on road and rail mileage and economic development in 23 Chinese provinces. The average road mileage is about 290,000 km and the average railroad mileage is about 7,400 km. In terms of economic development indicators, the GDP per capita is 55,000 RMB.
count
320
320
mean
7473.09
289176.29
std
20512.53
786374.69
min
461.27
12084
25%
2341.98
104007.36
50%
4011.94
157134.5
75%
5194.01
210322.95
max
146330.44
5198120.27
3.Exploratory data analysis
1. China's overall GDP from 2011-2010
The figure shows China‘s overall GDP from 2011 to 2010
Through the map above, we can find that there is a regional imbalance in China's economic development, with the eastern and central provinces being more economically developed.
With the above MAP, we can find that from 2011 to 2020, the economic development of the central and eastern provinces is faster.
China's rail and road mileage has grown in the decade from 2011 to 2020.
Transportation infrastructure development varies widely from province to province in China, but is generally growing.
4.Regression analysis
4.1Model
Based on the data I developed the following model with the independent variable of rail miles/road miles and the dependent variable of GDP.
Model:ln(GDP)=α+βln(Road mileage)+u
4.2Visualiztion
4.2.1China
According to the country's economic development plan, China is divided into the central, eastern, western, and northeastern parts.
4.2.2Road mileage and GDP
4.2.3Railroad mileage and GDP
4.2.4Conclusion
根据散点图,可以发现,铁路里程和公路里程和GDP数据存在正相关关系在中国的各个区域。
4.3Regression analysis of GDP and road mileage
4.3.1Regression analysis of GDP and road mileage
OLS Regression Results
==============================================================================
Dep. Variable: lnGDP R-squared: 0.138
Model: OLS Adj. R-squared: 0.135
Method: Least Squares F-statistic: 49.18
Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2022 Prob (F-statistic): 1.49e-11
Time: 08:43:50 Log-Likelihood: -411.06
No. Observations: 310 AIC: 826.1
Df Residuals: 308 BIC: 833.6
Df Model: 1
Covariance Type: nonrobust
==============================================================================
coef std err t P>|t| [0.025 0.975]
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
const 4.6595 0.727 6.413 0.000 3.230 6.089
lnRM 0.4355 0.062 7.012 0.000 0.313 0.558
==============================================================================
Omnibus: 25.685 Durbin-Watson: 1.095
Prob(Omnibus): 0.000 Jarque-Bera (JB): 30.572
Skew: -0.670 Prob(JB): 2.30e-07
Kurtosis: 3.755 Cond. No. 165.
==============================================================================
Notes:
[1] Standard Errors assume that the covariance matrix of the errors is correctly specified.
4.3.2Regression analysis of GDP and railroad mileage
OLS Regression Results
==============================================================================
Dep. Variable: lnGDP R-squared: 0.192
Model: OLS Adj. R-squared: 0.189
Method: Least Squares F-statistic: 73.00
Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2022 Prob (F-statistic): 6.10e-16
Time: 08:43:50 Log-Likelihood: -401.05
No. Observations: 310 AIC: 806.1
Df Residuals: 308 BIC: 813.6
Df Model: 1
Covariance Type: nonrobust
==============================================================================
coef std err t P>|t| [0.025 0.975]
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
const 5.0260 0.554 9.069 0.000 3.935 6.117
lnRRM 0.5866 0.069 8.544 0.000 0.451 0.722
==============================================================================
Omnibus: 2.835 Durbin-Watson: 1.063
Prob(Omnibus): 0.242 Jarque-Bera (JB): 2.627
Skew: -0.154 Prob(JB): 0.269
Kurtosis: 2.670 Cond. No. 90.3
==============================================================================
Notes:
[1] Standard Errors assume that the covariance matrix of the errors is correctly specified.
4.3.3Regression analysis of GDP and road mileage in the Center
OLS Regression Results
==============================================================================
Dep. Variable: lnGDP R-squared: 0.849
Model: OLS Adj. R-squared: 0.847
Method: Least Squares F-statistic: 326.6
Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2022 Prob (F-statistic): 1.69e-25
Time: 08:43:50 Log-Likelihood: 22.679
No. Observations: 60 AIC: -41.36
Df Residuals: 58 BIC: -37.17
Df Model: 1
Covariance Type: nonrobust
==============================================================================
coef std err t P>|t| [0.025 0.975]
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
const -9.6443 1.093 -8.823 0.000 -11.832 -7.456
lnRM 1.6165 0.089 18.072 0.000 1.437 1.796
==============================================================================
Omnibus: 0.150 Durbin-Watson: 0.817
Prob(Omnibus): 0.928 Jarque-Bera (JB): 0.216
Skew: -0.111 Prob(JB): 0.898
Kurtosis: 2.808 Cond. No. 618.
==============================================================================
Notes:
[1] Standard Errors assume that the covariance matrix of the errors is correctly specified.
4.3.4Regression analysis of GDP and railroad mileage in the Center
OLS Regression Results
==============================================================================
Dep. Variable: lnGDP R-squared: 0.331
Model: OLS Adj. R-squared: 0.319
Method: Least Squares F-statistic: 28.70
Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2022 Prob (F-statistic): 1.52e-06
Time: 08:43:50 Log-Likelihood: -22.013
No. Observations: 60 AIC: 48.03
Df Residuals: 58 BIC: 52.21
Df Model: 1
Covariance Type: nonrobust
==============================================================================
coef std err t P>|t| [0.025 0.975]
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
const -0.4803 1.977 -0.243 0.809 -4.437 3.476
lnRRM 1.2603 0.235 5.357 0.000 0.789 1.731
==============================================================================
Omnibus: 10.589 Durbin-Watson: 2.159
Prob(Omnibus): 0.005 Jarque-Bera (JB): 11.218
Skew: -1.054 Prob(JB): 0.00366
Kurtosis: 3.202 Cond. No. 367.
==============================================================================
Notes:
[1] Standard Errors assume that the covariance matrix of the errors is correctly specified.
4.3.5Regression analysis of GDP and road mileage in the east
OLS Regression Results
==============================================================================
Dep. Variable: lnGDP R-squared: 0.424
Model: OLS Adj. R-squared: 0.418
Method: Least Squares F-statistic: 72.18
Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2022 Prob (F-statistic): 2.20e-13
Time: 08:43:50 Log-Likelihood: -100.90
No. Observations: 100 AIC: 205.8
Df Residuals: 98 BIC: 211.0
Df Model: 1
Covariance Type: nonrobust
==============================================================================
coef std err t P>|t| [0.025 0.975]
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
const 4.5434 0.681 6.670 0.000 3.192 5.895
lnRM 0.5166 0.061 8.496 0.000 0.396 0.637
==============================================================================
Omnibus: 20.578 Durbin-Watson: 2.238
Prob(Omnibus): 0.000 Jarque-Bera (JB): 25.432
Skew: -1.124 Prob(JB): 3.00e-06
Kurtosis: 4.026 Cond. No. 115.
==============================================================================
Notes:
[1] Standard Errors assume that the covariance matrix of the errors is correctly specified.
4.3.6Regression analysis of GDP and railroad mileage in the east
OLS Regression Results
==============================================================================
Dep. Variable: lnGDP R-squared: 0.373
Model: OLS Adj. R-squared: 0.367
Method: Least Squares F-statistic: 58.41
Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2022 Prob (F-statistic): 1.46e-11
Time: 08:43:50 Log-Likelihood: -105.12
No. Observations: 100 AIC: 214.2
Df Residuals: 98 BIC: 219.4
Df Model: 1
Covariance Type: nonrobust
==============================================================================
coef std err t P>|t| [0.025 0.975]
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
const 5.3542 0.651 8.222 0.000 4.062 6.647
lnRRM 0.6473 0.085 7.642 0.000 0.479 0.815
==============================================================================
Omnibus: 7.945 Durbin-Watson: 2.139
Prob(Omnibus): 0.019 Jarque-Bera (JB): 8.264
Skew: -0.704 Prob(JB): 0.0161
Kurtosis: 2.942 Cond. No. 72.8
==============================================================================
Notes:
[1] Standard Errors assume that the covariance matrix of the errors is correctly specified.
4.3.7Regression analysis of GDP and road mileage in the west
OLS Regression Results
==============================================================================
Dep. Variable: lnGDP R-squared: 0.592
Model: OLS Adj. R-squared: 0.589
Method: Least Squares F-statistic: 171.2
Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2022 Prob (F-statistic): 1.01e-24
Time: 08:43:50 Log-Likelihood: -115.85
No. Observations: 120 AIC: 235.7
Df Residuals: 118 BIC: 241.3
Df Model: 1
Covariance Type: nonrobust
==============================================================================
coef std err t P>|t| [0.025 0.975]
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
const -6.1390 1.166 -5.267 0.000 -8.447 -3.831
lnRM 1.2893 0.099 13.086 0.000 1.094 1.484
==============================================================================
Omnibus: 9.438 Durbin-Watson: 2.031
Prob(Omnibus): 0.009 Jarque-Bera (JB): 9.782
Skew: -0.697 Prob(JB): 0.00751
Kurtosis: 3.111 Cond. No. 237.
==============================================================================
Notes:
[1] Standard Errors assume that the covariance matrix of the errors is correctly specified.
R4.3.8egression analysis of GDP and railroad mileage in the west
OLS Regression Results
==============================================================================
Dep. Variable: lnGDP R-squared: 0.575
Model: OLS Adj. R-squared: 0.571
Method: Least Squares F-statistic: 159.6
Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2022 Prob (F-statistic): 1.17e-23
Time: 08:43:50 Log-Likelihood: -118.33
No. Observations: 120 AIC: 240.7
Df Residuals: 118 BIC: 246.2
Df Model: 1
Covariance Type: nonrobust
==============================================================================
coef std err t P>|t| [0.025 0.975]
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
const 0.6418 0.672 0.955 0.341 -0.689 1.972
lnRRM 1.0508 0.083 12.631 0.000 0.886 1.216
==============================================================================
Omnibus: 22.441 Durbin-Watson: 1.126
Prob(Omnibus): 0.000 Jarque-Bera (JB): 6.347
Skew: 0.213 Prob(JB): 0.0419
Kurtosis: 1.957 Cond. No. 92.3
==============================================================================
Notes:
[1] Standard Errors assume that the covariance matrix of the errors is correctly specified.
4.3.9Regression analysis of GDP and road mileage in the Northeast
OLS Regression Results
==============================================================================
Dep. Variable: lnGDP R-squared: 0.000
Model: OLS Adj. R-squared: -0.035
Method: Least Squares F-statistic: 0.01252
Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2022 Prob (F-statistic): 0.912
Time: 08:43:50 Log-Likelihood: -6.4961
No. Observations: 30 AIC: 16.99
Df Residuals: 28 BIC: 19.79
Df Model: 1
Covariance Type: nonrobust
==============================================================================
coef std err t P>|t| [0.025 0.975]
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
const 10.0842 3.133 3.218 0.003 3.666 16.503
lnRM -0.0299 0.267 -0.112 0.912 -0.577 0.517
==============================================================================
Omnibus: 6.634 Durbin-Watson: 2.643
Prob(Omnibus): 0.036 Jarque-Bera (JB): 2.910
Skew: 0.478 Prob(JB): 0.233
Kurtosis: 1.811 Cond. No. 652.
==============================================================================
Notes:
[1] Standard Errors assume that the covariance matrix of the errors is correctly specified.
4.3.10Regression analysis of GDP and railroad mileage in the Northeast
OLS Regression Results
==============================================================================
Dep. Variable: lnGDP R-squared: 0.056
Model: OLS Adj. R-squared: 0.022
Method: Least Squares F-statistic: 1.651
Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2022 Prob (F-statistic): 0.209
Time: 08:43:50 Log-Likelihood: -5.6434
No. Observations: 30 AIC: 15.29
Df Residuals: 28 BIC: 18.09
Df Model: 1
Covariance Type: nonrobust
==============================================================================
coef std err t P>|t| [0.025 0.975]
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
const 5.6827 3.153 1.802 0.082 -0.776 12.142
lnRRM 0.4703 0.366 1.285 0.209 -0.279 1.220
==============================================================================
Omnibus: 6.833 Durbin-Watson: 2.660
Prob(Omnibus): 0.033 Jarque-Bera (JB): 3.702
Skew: 0.646 Prob(JB): 0.157
Kurtosis: 1.862 Cond. No. 499.
==============================================================================
Notes:
[1] Standard Errors assume that the covariance matrix of the errors is correctly specified.
5.Concluding remarks
Through regression analysis, I got the following conclusions.
1. There is a regional imbalance in China's economic development, with the eastern region being the most developed and the western region is less developed. This regional imbalance also exists in transportation infrastructure development.
2. In general, transportation infrastructure construction (railroad construction and road construction) positively affects economic growth without considering the effects of other control variables.
3. Overall, railroad construction impacts China's economic development more than road construction.
4. In northeastern China, road construction hurts economic growth.
5. There are regional differences in the impact of transportation infrastructure on economic development, with transportation infrastructure construction having a more substantial effect on economic development in the central and western regions.