Sign inGet started
← Back to all guides

Pandas vs Polars

By Nick Barth

Updated on March 6, 2024

As the volume and complexity of data continue to surge, adept handling of data frames has become the cornerstone of efficient data science and big data workflows. Python alone boasts two notable players in the realm of data manipulation and analysis: the long-standing champion Pandas and the up-and-coming contender, Polars.

This seismic shift in the landscape of data frames is not only of interest to Python aficionados but is pivotal in driving performance outcomes and, consequently, business decisions. In this post, we dive deep into the arena, contrasting these two libraries to guide data scientists, big data enthusiasts, and Python developers through the maze of choosing the right tool for their next data endeavour.

Embracing the almighty Pandas

A symbol of data agility

Pandas, a versatile and user-friendly open-source data analysis and manipulation library, has been the workhorse of countless data professionals. It boasts an incredibly rich set of functionalities and is the go-to tool for tasks such as data reading, data cleaning, slicing, dicing, and summarizing data sets.

Uncovering Pandas' use cases

Pandas shines brightest in data science projects of varying sizes. It is widely favored when handling moderately-sized data sets due to its intuitive interface, which allows for quick experimentation and prototyping. Its Series and DataFrame data structures offer a familiar table format that makes the analytical process digestible and efficient.

On the starting line of performance

However, Pandas is not free from limitations. It can hit bottlenecks when tackling larger datasets, causing performance degradation and, potentially, out-of-memory errors. Data scientists often find themselves seeking better performance alternatives for their scaled-up analyses.

The rise of the Polars titan

Polars: A new dawn for big data processing

In contrast to the monolithic architecture of Pandas, Polars is designed from the ground up to handle big data. It serves as a high-performance data frame library that aims to cater to accelerating the data processing capabilities required in modern big data and machine learning applications.

What makes Polars unique

Polars leverages Rust, a high-performance programming language, to bring high-speed execution to the inherently slower Python environment. It also adopts a lazy computation model similar to Apache Arrow's Flight protocol, which optimizes resource usage and allows for more efficient parallel computing.

Scaling heights in Big Data

Polars swoops in as the overlord of large-scale data processing, with its lucid syntax and ease of use giving it the wings to soar above the competition. Users particularly appreciate its ability to handle datasets that are too large for Pandas to manage effectively, without compromising on speed or memory efficiency.

The comparison: Speed, memory, and user experience

Head to head: Pandas versus Polars' performance

When pitted against each other in performance benchmarks, Polars emerges as the frontrunner, especially when dealing with larger datasets. Its capability to cut down on processing times, thanks to its use of Rust, is a game-changer in the context of extremely large data tables.

Memory footprint battle: Who comes out on top?

In terms of memory usage, Polars excels in mindful allocation, ensuring that even the largest datasets can be accommodated within the available RAM. Pandas, on the other hand, can be less efficient, potentially causing resource exhaustion on systems with constrained memory.

Syntax and developer satisfaction

In the realm of user experience and syntax, Pandas is lauded for its approachability—after all, it's the language of data wranglers. Polars, though a relative newcomer, is quickly gaining ground due to its provision of familiar Pandas API abstractions along with a modern, high-performance backend.

Case studies: Real-world showdowns

Pandas harmonizes with health data

In a case study involving a health data analytics project, Pandas proved its mettle in comfortably handling data frames relevant to patient records, treatments, and outcomes. The intuitive and descriptive nature of its operations made for an accessible analytical experience.

Polars pilots financial predictions

Contrasting the health sector, a financial organization's predictive modeling project benefited immensely from the power of Polars' handling of immense data sets. Its robustness with financial time series data and its near-flawless execution of machine learning algorithms speaks volumes for its efficacy.

Post-match analysis: Choosing your champion

Setting the criteria for selection

Deciding between Pandas and Polars ultimately boils down to your project's specifics. For smaller to medium-sized projects, Pandas remains an excellent choice due to its ease of use and the robustness of its ecosystem. However, for projects demanding high-speed analysis of large datasets, or working in constrained memory environments, Polars offers an edge that can significantly impact project outcomes.

Selecting the right library: A strategic move

The decision-making process should be strategic, considering factors such as project scale, resource availability, and team expertise. While transitioning to a new library might entail a learning curve and retooling, the dividends from better performance and scalability can be substantial, particularly in the arena of big data and machine learning.

Exploring beyond the showdown

Both Pandas and Polars have secure positions in the data scientist's toolkit, and the choice between the two is not necessarily a binary one. In fact, skilled data practitioners are beginning to use them in tandem, leveraging the strengths of each library for various aspects of their projects. This bodes well for a future where the data landscape is not conquered by a single entity but is instead sculpted by the interplay of versatile tools and methodologies.

In conclusion, it comes down to this: know your data, know your tools, and choose wisely. Whether you hitch your wagon to the familiar, robust Pandas or the speed-demon Polars, let it be a conscious decision aligned with your project's needs and future ambitions. As the world hurtles forward, be ready with the right tools to guide your journey through the ever-expanding universe of data science and big data.

That’s it, time to try Deepnote

Get started – it’s free
Book a demo



  • Integrations
  • Pricing
  • Documentation
  • Changelog
  • Security




  • Privacy
  • Terms

© Deepnote